A lot of protagonists of the steering committee and as well other leading scientists are known for their Christian-conservative and patronising ideas and it is evident, that this has influenced the vote in Germany in 2015 against self-determination at the end of life and it bias as well the scientific research.
85% of our secularistic society defend self-determination – so why does such a small group get such an influence?
Markus Zimmermann-Acklin
This german Catholic theologian for Morality is representing groups with interests opposite accompanied suicide and is therefore biased. He is involved in the NEK (National ethic commission). Four scientist in that commission are known as well for their patronising Christian- conservatives ideas.
Christine Bartsch